Ramsey County Board against Voter I.D. Amendment

The state’s second most populated county came out against the constitutional amendment on this year’s ballot that will require photo i.d. in order to vote.
by Charlie Leck

The Ramsey County Board, saying photo i.d. voting would likely cost the county 1.25 million dollars to implement the required changes, passed a resolution opposing the constitutional amendment. Essentially, the Board was urging voters to vote against it – to vote NO on the issue.

The Board also voiced displeasure about the changes the law would make in same-day registration. Nearly all observers agree that same-day has worked extremely well in Minnesota over the years and we shouldn’t tamper with it.

The County Board voted 6 to 1 in opposing the amendment.

I vehemently oppose altering the way we vote in Minnesota. We have consistently recorded the highest voter turn-outs in the nation. The law will clearly discriminate against low-incomed, the aged, and against college students who are away from home and don’t have photo i.d. that shows their college addresses. We have found voter fraud to be a problem in less than one-tenth of one-percent of all votes cast here in Minnesota – an amount that would not have effected any election in the state’s history.

Pre-vote opinions on the constitutional amendment have now drawn close to even. A few months ago over 75 percent of voters thought the issue should be passed. A hard, honest campaign against the change has turned around opinions in many parts of the state. Last week, former governor Arne Carlson came out hard against the issue and appeared in a public debate urging voters to say “no” on the issue. He provided assurance that fraud is not an issue in the state and that the implementation of the law would be both unfair and costly. Carlson is a former Republican governor. He certainly, however, cannot be identified with the current crop of rogue Republicans who have hijacked the party for their own radical purposes.

Photo i.d. doesn’t make sense.
It certainly has no place on the Constitution of the State of Minnesota. That idea is asinine. I urge all of my Minnesota readers to vote against the voter i.d. amendment proposal.

_________________________

Why not become a follower?
If you read my blog regularly, why not become a follower? All you have to do is click in the upper right hand corner and establish a simple means of communication. Then you'll be informed every time a new blog is posted here. If all that's confusing, here's Google's explanation of how to do it! If you don’t want to post comments on the blog, but would like to communicate with me about it, send me an email if you’d like.

Ranked Choice Voting

There is a better, fairer and more democratic way to vote! Try it! You’ll like it!
by Charlie Leck

We’re getting a strong push here in Minnesota for Ranked Choice Voting [RCV]. I think its day is coming. We belong to an organization up here called FairVote MN and we contribute some money to its work. Here’s how they explain what they stand for and what they are working toward:

“Ranked Choice Voting allows voters to rank candidates on the ballot according to their preference - 1st choice, 2nd choice, 3rd choice, etc. Voters cast their vote for their favorite candidate knowing that if he or she doesn't gather enough votes to win, their vote will count toward their second choice. In a single-winner election, votes cast for the least popular candidate are not "wasted", but rather redistributed to more popular candidates, based on the voters' second choices, until one candidate wins with a majority of votes.”

In the election for governor here in Minnesota, we haven't had any candidate elected by a majority since Arne Carlson in 1996.

In the gubernatorial election we just had, I am quite certain that the candidate I supported the most enthusiastically, and who was elected, wouldn’t have won under the ranked choice system. Nevertheless, I support the system because I think it seems more democratic than having officials elected with less than a majority of the votes.

Here’s an opinion-piece, written by three solid Minnesota Republicans, touting the virtues of Ranked Choice voting. It appeared in our local news rag up here, the StarTribune.

A number of cities across the nation use RCV in their municipal elections and its proven itself to be easy, clear and fair. RCV is used in the following jurisdictions:

Aspen (CO)
Berkeley (CA)
Burlington (VT)
Cambridge (MA)
Hendersonville (NC)
Minneapolis (MN)
Oakland (CA)
Pierce County (WA)
San Francisco
South Carolina (for overseas voters in fed and state runoffs)
Takoma Park (MD)

In 2011, Memphis (TN), Springfield (IL) and Telluride (CO) will all begin using the system in city elections. The voting method is standard procedure in Australia, New Zealand, Scotland and Ireland. It also used by the city of London.

If you’re interested in learning more, a Google search will bring you plenty of information and lots of opinions. You might want to first start with Rob Richie’s November 2009 article on the Huffington Post. John Nichols’ piece in Nation Magazine, We Need Majority-Rule Elections, is also very informative.

There’s probably a FairVote organization in your state. Just google “FairVote” and include your state's initials – such as, “FairVote SC” or “FairVote MI” or “FairVote NJ” – and join up if you think the process makes sense.

The method will make it much more difficult for 3rd parties or independents to spoil election results.

_________________________

Why not become a follower?
If you read my blog regularly, why not become a follower? All you have to do is click in the upper right hand corner and establish a simple means of communication. Then you'll be informed every time a new blog is posted here. If all that's confusing, here's Google's explanation of how to do it!