Showing posts with label Stan Fish. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stan Fish. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Stan Fish Gets it Right on Wisconsin

What happened in Wisconsin really had me thinking. The whole thing smelled real bad and it got me sick!
by Charlie Leck

I'm on vacation, but I'm keeping up on my reading and, as I regularly do, I've been reading the NY Times. I came across Stanley Fish's latest piece about Wisconsin and its teachers' unions.

This is the best piece I've read to counter what recently happened to teachers' unions in Wisconsin. There's lots of reasons I'm angry at the Wisconsin Governor (not least among those reasons is his relationship with the horrid Koch brothers), but I'm not going there today -- not enough time while I'm down here in Mobile trying to relax on a little golfing vacation.

If you're shaky on the issues in Wisconsin, I urge you to read this piece by one of my favorite columnists (opinionators). Here's just a little taste of what he's saying in that column...
"Governor Walker of Wisconsin cites budgetary woes as the reason for taking away the bargaining rights of public sector unions, but everyone knows that his real reason is to reduce union membership (why join and pay dues if there is no longer any strength in numbers?) and thus dry up support that would have gone largely to Democratic candidates. Wisconsin Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald (shouldn't there be a patent on names?) makes it official: 'If we win this battle and the money is not there under the auspices of the unions... President Obama is going to have a... much more difficult time getting elected.'"

Hope you take the time to read the whole piece!

Wednesday, December 29, 2010

A review of True Grit


A review of True Grit by Stanley Fish makes for great reading
by Charlie Leck

I guess there’s some controversy about the Cohen Brothers’ remake of the movie, True Grit. Frankly, I haven’t seen it, though I certainly will – because I admire the movie making skills of these guys even though I often come out of a viewing shaking my head and wondering about them.

Well, I’ll tell you, I just read a New York Times review of the movie by Stanley Fish. What a piece of writing!

Don’t miss the movie and, certainly, don’t miss this review of it!

_________________________

Why not become a follower?
If you read my blog regularly, why not become a follower? All you have to do is click in the upper right hand corner and establish a simple means of communication. Then you'll be informed every time a new blog is posted here. If all that's confusing, here's Google's explanation of how to do it!

Wednesday, September 8, 2010

What is a Blog?


I swear to God, with a straight face she sat there at the dinner table with me, looked me right in the eye, and asked me: What is a blog?
by Charlie Leck

I’m not kidding she really did.

We dined on Monday evening with and at the home of two of the most wonderful people we know – a couple with whom we enjoy sitting and chatting about this and that and everything. They both have incredible educations and experiences to draw upon and they have marvelous, expansive minds. Last night, as usual, the conversations were wonderful.

Part of the joy of being with them is sitting their home. The living room, or drawing room as she calls it, has one solid wall of books and another wall is half covered with books. Their living room/dining room combination has two long walls with books from floor to ceiling. I’m comfortable in a place like that and I'm put immediately at ease. Here, where I now write, I am surrounded by shelves of book on every side, interrupted only occasionally by a door or window. I can hunker-down here and worries, troubles and anxieties leave me and I am in a state of spiritual bliss.

So, last night, she wanted to know how to find my blog and she was prepared to write it (the URL) out. Instead I promised to send along an email with a link to it. She has an email account at the University and a computer to use there. He, though a distinguished business attorney in Minneapolis, doesn’t have or use a computer. I’m not kidding here! He doesn’t! I told you these are special people – out of the ordinary and wonderful to be around.

Then, sitting there at dinner, enjoying a wonderful keish and a fresh, fresh green salad, with a splendid glass of white wine, she asked me a question that knocked me for a loop. Really! It did.

“What is a blog?”

She was straight-faced and serious about it, looking me right in the eye and anticipating a direct, clear reply.

“Well,…” and I babbled on, really at a loss for a clear and technical definition. I could only spin out examples that really didn't answer the question. It was as if someone had asked me to define “mud” and all I could do was cup my hands together and say: “You know, a bunch of yucky dirt that is all wet, but not too wet, and it’s sticky and mucky and stuff.”

So, I came home and sat here in my little, private library, surrounded by my books and I began thinking about it. And, in the quiet calmness, with time, I began remembering.

Web-log!
That’s where the word comes from. It’s a conglomeration! It’s a contraction! It’s a breeding together of the two words – web and blog – to form blog!

“You know, dear, how folks used to write – I mean, by hand, using a pen and ink and all – a journal or diary. Well, a blog is like that. It’s a journal you are willing to share with other folks who might be interested in coming along to read it.”

Now, with that soliloquy, her eyes may have brightened up instead of growing gray with the incoming fog of my failed explanation last night.

"Well, I mean, I began my blog as a journal for my grandchildren. I had no idea it would get out of hand and soon I would be raving and raging like a madman about matters political. Who was to know I would end up screaming about injustice and cruelty and calling elected officials idiots? Who knew?"

The wonder of the web – the deliriously mysterious world wide web – is that any old guy, sitting in his library, surrounded by his books, can now become a social commentator and political opinionator. I can testify to that; for I am one!

“Blogs can be about a million things,” I told her last night. Her eyes were still clouded over.

I mean, now, sitting here, I understand what I wanted to say. There are blogs about photography and needlepoint. A zillion of them are about cooking and food. Some are only about baseball. There are fashion blogs, music blogs, art blogs and education blogs. There are blogs about dreams or home gardening. Some blogs are strictly personal – perhaps written just for one's own family and about family matters. Then, there are corporate blogs, just for members of a company or firm.

Some blogs can be accessed by anyone and some blogs are blocked and open only to specified people.

If you want to find a blog of a particular nature, it’s not difficult – just go ahead and google or bing the topic and specify that you are looking for blogs – like, I mean, ask for “blogs about geckoes.”

There are millions of blogs out there right now – we call it the blogosphere! Some of them have a few readers and some of them have millions of devoted fans.

I’ve heard historians talk about the immense pool of information that will be available for future historians of our own time. There will be billions of pages of information to wade through instead of millions. Some of it will be rich and some kind of yucky – clear as, you know, mud, which I defined for you earlier.

Want to see some wonderful examples of blogging? Here’s a few that you might find entrancing or intriguing:

An intellectual blog: Stanley Fish
Fish is a professor of humanities and law at Florida International University. He formerly taught at the University of Chicago and at the University of California (Berkely). He’s authored more than a dozen books. One of those books I have here in my library (
How to Write a Sentence).

Want to see the other end of the spectrum? Dead Frog!
This purports to be a comedy blog. You can see a lot of yucky stuff here! You know,
real mud!

Or, would you like to see a list of the top 25 business law blogs out there on the web. The LexisNexis Community , a well respected organization, lists these.

Take a look at a tough talking, frank, lay it on the line blog called The Daily Beast
You’d better have some hippy type bones in your old body to go and look at this one.

Or, how about a blog from a just-plain-old-guy from Cleveland who spins out common sense thinking by the barrel… From Tony’s Keyboard
I read every single posting and enjoy his downright sensible way of thinking.

There now!
That’s all I can tell you about blogging. Why have I posted over a thousand blogs? It’s more difficult to answer
that than to define what blogging is. I guess I must just plain enjoy it.

_________________________

You can email Charles Leck
or you can sign-in to post a comment on the blog
or you can click on “follow” in the top right hand corner

Monday, July 7, 2008

A Wordsmith Par Excellence



Just what do (did) those 27 words in the constitution really mean?
by Charlie Leck


Part III of my blog on Minority Education (Schools that Work)
is in process and coming along all right; however, it is the most difficult of the three parts and it needs more research and fact checking. I'll continue work on it and I hope to post it in the next week or two. In the meantime, I'd like to point you to one of my favorite blogs and to which I've pointed you before.

The Supreme Court isn't always correct, you know. That's very important to bear in mind. And, my friends, it is one of the most important considerations to keep in mind when you vote for a person to be President of the United States. George Bush's personal impression will be left upon this nation for many generations because of the appointments he made to the Supreme Court.

For instance, the recent Washington, D.C. gun issue decision of the biggest court will have an extraordinary effect on this nation for ages. I was shocked to hear Barack Obama so lightly say that it was the proper decision. He may be an expert in constitutional law, but I'm not sure he was straightforward about this issue at all.

What shocked me most, when I read the decision, is that these 5 guys consider themselves strict constructionists. Stan Smith will help you understand those 27 words.

Stan Fish writes a blog in the NY Times that he calls Think Again. Fish is an astute thinker and an extraordinary wordsmith.


"Stanley Fish is the Davidson-Kahn Distinguished University Professor and a professor of law at Florida International University, in Miami, and dean emeritus of the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences at the University of Illinois at Chicago. He has also taught at the University of California at Berkeley, Johns Hopkins and Duke University. He is the author of 10 books. His new book on higher education, "Save the World On Your Own Time," will be published in 2008." NY Times sidebar on the Fish Blog

Fish deals with those 27 words over which the Supreme Court ruled very recently – in a 5-4 split decision. I hope you'll take the time to read it – especially if constitutional issues interest you.

Come on back on Wednesday, when we'll have something original posted.