Showing posts with label do we have a terrible health care system. Show all posts
Showing posts with label do we have a terrible health care system. Show all posts

Sunday, March 31, 2013

Standing by “Bitter Pill”


My old man, Henry W. Leck, shown here in a 1926
photograph, never had health insurance in his entire
life. In the 50s, when my mother encountered a terrible
health problem, my old man was broken like a dry
stick and left basically destitute for the rest of his life.
Thank goodness he had sons and a daughter who
could help out.

A reader, Neil, recently commented on my blog of 11 March 2013…
by Charlie Leck

“I take extreme umbrage with that statement. America is without a doubt the leader in specialized medicine. That is why executives and government officials in other countries (Britain and Canada specifically) will fly across oceans and over borders to have their surgery done here. Look at the flawed studies which rank the US far below our socialist brothers in Europe, they include all types of death including homicides and car accidents in calculating the "health care rankings.”

I would like to point Neil to an editorial comment column in this morning’s StarTribune (our local newspaper) written by John Reynolds: “Fixing the Dated U.S. Health Care System.” The article’s working premise is stated in the sub-title: “There’s a truth we’ve yet to accept – no matter what system we devise, it will be unfair.”

The Time Magazine article (nearly 50 pages long) that I referred to in that earlier blog is one of the most important statements about America’s health care system that has ever been popularly published. I continue to agree with that article’s statement about our broken system, with which Neil so strongly disagrees.

In this morning’s piece in our local paper, Reynold’s says…

“The United States is arguably the wealthiest country in the industrialized world. We spend more on health care than any other country. How can our infant mortality rates be increasing? How can our life expectancy not be as good as other countries?
“The relevant statistics do not paint an optimistic story. We spend more than anyone else and our outcomes are not keeping pace; in fact, they are getting worse. The following helps to illustrate some of the areas of deep concern….
“…On average, the United States spends twice as much on health care per capita, and 50 percent more as a share of GDP, as other industrialized nations do. And yet we fail to reap the benefits of longer lives, lower infant mortality, universal access and quality of care realized by many other high-income countries.
“There is broad evidence, as well, that much of that excess spending is wasteful. Stabilizing health spending and targeting it in ways that ensure access to care and improve health outcomes would free up billions of dollars annually for critically needed economic and social investments — both public and private — as well as higher wages for workers.”

No, I think it is safe to stand with the accuracy of Steven Brill’s statements in my earlier blog. Neil, the commenter, should take a look at the facts once again.

And, the thesis expressed in today’s column in our local paper is absolutely right-on: “In order to fix a broken health care system — or devise one in the first place — the policymaking conversation must start with consensus among the parties as to the basic assumptions and parameters that will apply equally to everyone and form the basis of a system that is as fair and equitable as humanly possible.”
 As much as we don’t like to admit it in this country, we must look to some of the other progressive nations in the world to see how we might fix our own health care system – Canada, England, Germany, France, Sweden, and a number of other very efficient and productive systems.”



_________________________
Why not become a follower?
If you read my blog regularly, why not become a follower? All you have to do is click in the upper right hand corner and establish a simple means of communication. Then you'll be informed every time a new blog is posted here. If all that's confusing, here's Google's explanation of how to do it! If you don’t want to post comments on the blog, but would like to communicate with me about it, send me an email if you’d like.


Monday, August 31, 2009

Why? Why is the United States, for Pete's Sake....



Why don't we, such a rich country, cover everyone?
by Charlie Leck

On Eric Black's blog today, he asks the essential question about health care in the U.S.. Why don't we cover everyone?

"As I rediscovered last week, many opponents of universal health care in the U.S. like to say, and applaud anyone else who says, that the United States has the greatest health care system in the world. There is basically no reasonable way to back this statement up with a statistic that measures health outcomes. Americans have shorter life expectancies, infant mortality rates are higher here, and perhaps most relevantly, those who measure the rate of deaths that could have been prevented by medical care show the U.S. system to be below many of the wealthy industrialized nations of the world.

"And, as everyone must know by now, ours is the worst system in the world as measured by cost efficiency."
That's the essential question. Read Black's important blog of today.