America has always praised itself for fair and
square elections! In truth elections have been stolen quite regularly by nasty
and crooked sources who managed to come up with schemes that are sometime
illegal and sometimes unfair and untruthful – and sometimes both!
by Charlie Leck
by Charlie Leck
In
the 2012 election in the Minnesota Senate District in which I live the
Republican endorsed candidate for the Minnesota Senate – a wonderful, young
woman for whom I voted – was robbed of the election on the day before the vote
was to take place. Our mailboxes out here were stuffed with gaudy pamphlets and
fliers that told numerous lies about the young lady and wildly distorted and
twisted even the facts. She was a certain favorite to win the election and she
lost by a slim margin to the “independent” who was running – all because of
this erroneous and untruthful information. All my readers are aware that I am a
long-time and loyal Democrat and I rarely vote on the other side of the ticket.
On this occasion I did and feel like I was cheated. A dirty and distasteful
group of radical conservatives (who love to sing their patriotic songs and
speak of God and flag) very unfairly swiped this Minnesota Senate seat.
And,
to top it off, there was no attribution on these deceitful flyers as to who was
responsible for making the charges and distributing these materials.
I’ve
run a number of political campaigns and they were hard and tough campaigns, but
we always attempted to tell the truth and we always stated carefully who we
were as a campaign organization and how we could be contacted. It’s just the
way it ought to be done. We understand that financial spending limits were
placed on the campaign and we always stayed within those limits.
“Drops,”
as we call them, the night before election, which tell lies and untruthfully
smear a candidate, are disgusting. The disgust is even increased where there is
no information about the persons or organization telling the lies.
The
Governor of Minnesota is now supporting a bill in the legislature that would
demand more protection is such advertising. He wants groups that spend money on
such advertising to be required to report that spending. He wants to put a stop
to small loop-holes that allow clearly political advertising and endorsement to
be called something other than political.
Come
on! If you say something about a political candidate you ought to be held
responsible for what you say and you ought to be required to indicate how much
money you’ve spent on such a clearly political promotion.
Hold
on to your hats because you are going to be surprised at who opposes such
current legislation – the National Rifle Association and Minnesota Citizens for
Life. They contend that such legislation limits “freedom of speech.” Have we
not learned that there are certain limits to the free speech provisions in the
constitution? You can not unfairly
and untruthfully liable a person! You must take responsibility for what you
say!
You
know who else opposes the Governor’s suggested legislation to expand what is
defined as political advertising? Oh, well, my, my, if it isn’t the fellow who
won the state senate race in our district in 2012.
The
League of Women Voters Minnesota (LWV Minnesota) supports such an expansion of
the definition of “political advertising and promotion.” The following is taken
from the organization’s December
2013 statement on the issue.
“Evaluating
disclosure laws for independent spending in the 50 states, a watchdog group has
given Minnesota an ‘F’ because of limitations in the state’s disclosure laws.
But even with limited disclosure requirements, campaign finance records reveal
that independent spenders – representing special interests – have stepped up
their spending in Minnesota by billions of dollars in the wake of Citizens United. In 2012, for instance,
groups independent of the candidates spent $4,200,853 more than the candidates
themselves on literature and advertisements. And that’s just the tip of the
iceberg.
“With so much
money pouring into elections advertisements, billboards and literature,
improved transparency is vital. The reforms recommended by League of Women
Voters Minnesota focus on measures that would provide greater disclosure so
that voters know who is trying to influence the outcome of elections. Voters
can then hold their elected officials accountable if the laws they enact tend
to reflect the interests of financial contributors rather than the public
interest.
“LWV Minnesota
advocates these immediate reforms in Minnesota’s campaign finance systems:
1.
Broaden
the category of communications requiring disclosure to those that clearly seek
to influence voters even though the ads do not use the so-called magic words
such as ‘vote for’ or ‘defeat.’ Specifically:
▪ Widen the definition of ‘express advocacy,’ and
▪ Require disclosure of ‘electioneering communications’
▪ Widen the definition of ‘express advocacy,’ and
▪ Require disclosure of ‘electioneering communications’
2.
Improve
the Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board’s website to provide easy and
timely accessibility for a citizen seeking to learn about donations and
expenditures in statewide election.
“If Minnesota
does not make these improvements in its disclosure requirements and practices,
our state fails to keep pace with the manner in which elections campaigns are
conducted in the 21st century, and our elected officials do a disservice to
themselves and the voters of the state.”
LWV
Minnesota is one of the most widely respected organizations in the state of
Minnesota and it takes such positions, as the above, with great care and
concern. Minnesota’s legislators should pay heed.
I
hope, if you are a Minnesotan, that you will urge your legislators to do the
same.
_________________________
Why not become a follower?
If you read my blog regularly, why not become a follower? All you have to do is click in the upper right hand corner and establish a simple means of communication. Then you'll be informed every time a new blog is posted here. If all that's confusing, here's Google's explanation of how to do it! If you don’t want to post comments on the blog, but would like to communicate with me about it, send me an email if you’d like.
If you read my blog regularly, why not become a follower? All you have to do is click in the upper right hand corner and establish a simple means of communication. Then you'll be informed every time a new blog is posted here. If all that's confusing, here's Google's explanation of how to do it! If you don’t want to post comments on the blog, but would like to communicate with me about it, send me an email if you’d like.
No comments:
Post a Comment