Turns
out that John Sinunu’s claim that President Obama couldn’t run a lemonade stand
is absolutely correct and I’ll be damned.
by Charlie Leck
by Charlie Leck
I’m out here on
a run toward New York City. The sun is newly up and I was on the very early
list for breakfast in the dining car. I took along a small log-book and began
making notes about something that has been roiling in me for a week. It’s what
that two-bit, political draft-horse, punk of a guy, John Sinunu, said about the
President.
Sinunu said that
President Obama couldn’t even run a lemonade stand. Wow! Couldn’t he have gone
somewhere else? Almost anywhere else?
I guess Sinunu
had some good information. I’ve got some solid, inside (and anonymous, of
course) information that does indeed indicate the President did have a number
of problems with a lemonade stand back in Chicago when he lived there. The
Obamas had a lovely home in the Kenwood neighborhood of Chicago’s Southside.
When the girls got to that certain stage all little kids get to, they wanted to
set up a lemonade stand on the sidewalk in front of their house. Of course, as
any dad would, Mr. Obama offered to help them. Well, he wasn’t the senior
operations guy on this project, but we have certain and undeniable word that
the lemonade stand took some pretty hefty losses (for those days) in the
neighborhood of twenty or thirty bucks.
Damn! That Sinunu
has more going for him than just that alliterative name. He’s got someone on
the inside providing solid information about the President’s business acumen.
Now Mitt Romney would have worked it differently and you can bet on it. The
former chief-executive-officer and sole stock holder of Bain Capital from uh,
uh, uh – well, from back then in, let’s see, in about 1984 – would have made
that lemonade stand a huge success. The President allowed his girls to use
home-grown, American lemons that were also organic. Far too costly were these
lemons to ever hope for a return. The sugar the girls used was also organic and
purchased from American owned companies. Finally, the water was first-class,
filtered water that was also a bit too costly. It’s difficult to make money
when the President insisted the girls hold the price to somewhere around a dime
for a glass of lemonade. It was one of those deals, much like my wife’s lamb
business – the more the girls sold, the more money they lost, though the lamb
is spectacularly good and so was the lemonade.
Now you can see
what I’m getting at and why I’m so damned angry about this attack on my wife –
er, I mean on the Obama children. Sinunu has no right to go off on these girls
that way.
On the other
hand, Mitt Romney can’t seem to clearly explain just when he stopped being the go-to guy at Bain Capital [Read Dana Milbank’s wonderful column in
the Washington Post: Romney and His Time Machine]. From the founding of the company,
Romney was its CEO and only stockholder. Romney, it seems, took a leave from
Bain in 1999 in order to save the Olympics that were to be held out in Utah.
Seems that some guy, who couldn’t run a lemonade stand, had tried to manage the
Olympics and got everything all screwed up. Romney saved the day and nobody
will deny that or argue the point.
The question is,
rather, when did Mr. Romney step down from running the Bain operation? Seems Bain
out-sourced a lot of jobs after 1999 and that wouldn’t seem good for Romney if
he was the company’s CEO. Yet, it seems that Mr. Romney’s name was still listed
on legal filings as the CEO and only stockholder during the period that the out-sourcing
took place. A spokesman for Romney now says that the retirement was
“retroactive” to February of 1999. Retroactive?
“Retroactive?
Retroactive? What the hell do you mean, retroactive?”
Dana Milbank
describes this as something akin to time-travel. Strange!
“Retroactive retirement! It was a brilliant formulation, perhaps
the greatest addition to the political lexicon since “no controlling legal
authority.” And it raised tantalizing possibilities: If Romney can do it,
perhaps others can go back in time to rearrange events.
“George W. Bush could retroactively end his presidency on Sept. 1,
2008, before the financial collapse. Donald Rumsfeld could retroactively pull
out of Iraq before the insurgency. President Obama could retroactively deny
government funding for Solyndra.” [Dana
Milbank]
Brilliant!
Brilliant! No wonder Romney is such a good business man. Maybe he could take us
back to a time period before a Republican president lied to us about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Or
certainly before a time when we foolishly expanded our mission in Afghanistan –
back to a time before we spent 3 or 4 trillion dollars on foolish wars.
I’ll bet, if Mr.
Obama, could time travel, he would take us retroactively back to a time before
he set the price for the girls on their lemonade sales and he would then allow
them to charge a quarter for a glass of delicious, organic and pure lemonade –
and, they could advertise that they were the daughters of a future U.S. President! Can you imagine
the sales?
I don’t know!
Train travel does something to me.
_________________________
Why not become a follower?
If you read my blog regularly, why not become a follower? All you have to do is click in the upper right hand corner and establish a simple means of communication. Then you'll be informed every time a new blog is posted here. If all that's confusing, here's Google's explanation of how to do it! If you don’t want to post comments on the blog, but would like to communicate with me about it, send me an email if you’d like.
If you read my blog regularly, why not become a follower? All you have to do is click in the upper right hand corner and establish a simple means of communication. Then you'll be informed every time a new blog is posted here. If all that's confusing, here's Google's explanation of how to do it! If you don’t want to post comments on the blog, but would like to communicate with me about it, send me an email if you’d like.
No comments:
Post a Comment