The
members of the Academy of Motion Picture
Arts and Sciences are insiders prone to voting for friends and trends and
are rarely in touch with any true sense of art! They keep a sharp eye out for
popular trends rather than artistic achievement.
by Charlie Leck
by Charlie Leck
What exactly
happened last night? The Academy cast
its votes and they were announced. Something went wrong and it all became more
and more clear to us (the people who go to the movies). Argo was a fine film. If it was the best picture of the year then
I’m a lowly simpleton (and there are many ready to cast a vote for that). And, Zero Dark Thirty was also a fine, fine
film. But, Lincoln? Lincoln was a
triumph – a masterpiece – a brilliant work of cinematic art! There are simply
not comparisons.
The members of
the Academy vote for their choices
based on a number of political connections and personal likes and dislikes that
we, on the outside, will never understand. The perception of the Academy as the
standard for determining the best of anything has been diminishing year after
year for nearly two decades now. Last night it hit rock bottom and it became
clear that the whole shebang has more to do with personality than art.
Lincoln simply should have been the best picture and Steven
Spielberg should have been the best director. There ain’t no two ways about it!
It was a year of
remarkable films and movie-goers were the real winners this year. However, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences
is nothing but a vague shadow of its former self! There are so many other
awarding organizations that have a better grip on the realities of cinema and
they are the honors to which we should
be paying attention. Real theater people have begun to disregard the opinions
of a bunch of people who are trying to either curry favors or repay them with
their votes (the Academy).
Last night’s big
show was as weak and distasteful and as even the Academy itself. My feeling after watching it was simply: “Who
cares?” I’ve read the reviews in the major newspapers across the country and
they are all essentially negative. Viewership is down for the show and, after
last night, I can see why! Bad jokes and bad decisions!
Glen Whipp, writing long after midnight
last night for the Los Angeles Times, said it best and I recommend his column
to you if you are even interested in this subject. He tells us what the Academy
really is and why we should disregard it.
But, as a
movie-goer (who dips into the popular movie offerings at main-line theaters)
how do you beat a year like this (in alpha order)?….
Argo
The Hobbit
Hyde Park on the Hudson
Les Miserables
Life of Pi
Lincoln
Sessions
Silver Linings Playbook
Zero-Dark-Thirty
It was a
triumphant year for Hollywood, but not for the Academy!
_________________________
Why not become a follower?
If you read my blog regularly, why not become a follower? All you have to do is click in the upper right hand corner and establish a simple means of communication. Then you'll be informed every time a new blog is posted here. If all that's confusing, here's Google's explanation of how to do it! If you don’t want to post comments on the blog, but would like to communicate with me about it, send me an email if you’d like.
If you read my blog regularly, why not become a follower? All you have to do is click in the upper right hand corner and establish a simple means of communication. Then you'll be informed every time a new blog is posted here. If all that's confusing, here's Google's explanation of how to do it! If you don’t want to post comments on the blog, but would like to communicate with me about it, send me an email if you’d like.
The problem was tht Lincoln has a habit of getting off'd in theaters. Didn't watch the Oscars. Based on your blog. I'm glad I didn't.
ReplyDelete