Tuesday, January 31, 2012

A Good Morning Laugh


There’s nothing like beginning the day with a big, hearty laugh. I’ve gotten going that way two mornings in a row now and I give appropriate thanks!
by Charlie Leck

A reader of our local newspaper (The StarTribune of the Twin Cities) recently sent in a note that was posted on Tuesday morning as “The Letter of the day.” Martin Urberg, of Minneapolis, seems to be warning the Republicans:

“The Republican nomination race,” Mr. Urberg writes, “reminds me of an old nursery rhyme…”

There once were two cats of Kilkenny
Each though there was one cat too many
So they fought and they fit
and they scratched and they bit
‘til except for their nails
and the tips of their tails
instead of two cats there weren’t any

Kudos and thanks to Mr. Urberg. I loved it. Nothing like beginning the morning with a big laugh!

I got yesterday off to a rolling start as well, when I read an email from my old, old friend Rich (Little River, SC) who sent this along (he said he’s seen it in a number of places and can’t attribute it to anyone)…

Grandad [sic] remembering the good old days…
When I was a boy, my Momma would send me down to a corner store with $1, and I’d come back with 5 bags of potatoes, 2 loaves of bread, 3 bottles of milk, a hunk of cheese, a box of tea, and 6 eggs.
You can’t do that now. Too many f---in’ security cameras!

After Florida’s votes are in tonight (a winner-take-all primary) Mitt Romney will probably have 87 delegates in the bank. Sorry to tell you this, but he needs 1,144 to secure the nomination, so this process will go on for awhile. That, I am afraid, is no laughing matter!

Until tomorrow!

_________________________
Why not become a follower?
If you read my blog regularly, why not become a follower? All you have to do is click in the upper right hand corner and establish a simple means of communication. Then you'll be informed every time a new blog is posted here. If all that's confusing, here's Google's explanation of how to do it! If you don’t want to post comments on the blog, but would like to communicate with me about it, send me an email if you’d like.

Monday, January 30, 2012

Minnesota, Vote NO on Defining and Limiting Marriage


We are asked to vote on an amendment to our state constitution this year that, if passed, will define marriage as only between a man and a woman! Please, Minnesota, do not vote for this constitutional amendment. Please vote NO!
by Charlie Leck

Minnesota and Minnesotans will face a distasteful choice when they enter the voting booth this fall and I hope we will stand tall and proud and fair and neighborly and vote NO on this amendment.

I read an essay very recently by one of Minnesota’s best known citizens, Marilyn Carlson Nelson, who also asked that we vote against this amendment. Her request came from the deepest part of her heart and it was bold, dramatic and forthright. Ms. Nelson is the daughter of the late Curt Carlson and she has served for many years as the CEO of the Carlson Companies, one of the nation’s largest privately owned corporations. She is also the mother of a lesbian and this gives her a significant understanding of this issue – an understanding that many of us don’t have.

I urge you to read her appeal in its entirety at…
http://www.startribune.com/opinion/otherviews/137316283.html

Here’s how the extraordinary Ms. Carlson Nelson begins her essay…

“We Minnesotans are blessed to live in a state that others envy, study and model. Minnesota is home to more Fortune 500 companies per capita than any other state. The Mayo Clinic and General Mills are regulars on Fortune's "Best Places to Work" list.
“We tout the nation's best biking trails and more theater seats per capita than any other metro area outside of New York City, and we're recognized for being the best region for working mothers.
“Dubbed one of ‘America's Top Brainpower Cities,’ Minneapolis leads the nation with 93 percent of its citizens earning high school diplomas and claims the highest volunteer rate in the country. We consistently lead the nation in voter turnout.
“And, to top it off, several Minnesota cities are cited as some of the best places in the country to live. We are indeed blessed.
“This year, we have another blessing – of an unusual sort. We have the opportunity to decide as a community if we will amend our state Constitution to include a ban on the right of same-sex couples to marry.
“My prediction and my hope is that we will resist. Our history suggests we will.
“With all of Minnesota's accomplishments and high rankings, it would be easy to be lulled into complacency. But a review of our past suggests that we are always mindful that culture is not inherited. It is created anew by each generation.
“We are especially adept at asking ourselves: ‘Is this who we want to be? Are we living our values?’
“And if we don't like the answer, we have many times ‘righted the culture’ to better reflect those values in our institutions, our corporations and our communities.”

Oh my, let’s be fair and kind to those who deserve as much as I, to have a life’s companion they can love and cherish – and with whom they can share all the legal rights that come to a couple through marriage.

At another point, Ms. Carlson Nelson says…

“While not perfect, we have consistently, through the generations, righted the culture to more clearly define who we are as Minnesotans -- a people of integrity, inclusiveness and decency, with an overriding sense of the common good.
Wouldn't it be presumptuous of us to impose today's biases on same-sex marriage on future generations? Do we want to shackle our grandchildren, perhaps for decades, with the vitriolic debate and sometimes violence that have preceded the great human-rights victories of our nation?"

Over the years I have learned, not by any effort but through utter collisions with the truth, that most gays and lesbians are what they are by the facts of birth and their inheritance of genetic identities. In other words, you or I could quite possibly have been born as something other than heterosexual (and maybe we were). Why should a person born into that sexual identity be punished by the laws – by the Constitution – of the state in which he/she lives?

Ms. Carlson Nelson urges us to not “constitutionally mandate discrimination.” Her argument is that it “is bad for business and bad for the economic opportunities of all Minnesotans.” I prefer to just lay on you the argument that it is just downright unfair and cruel. And, I believe, that it is, in the end, Ms. Carlson Nelson’s case as well.

She says how painful it would be to cut out of her life and work the many wonderful gay friends and associates she has had – “friends, family and colleagues” – “people who through a lifetime of ups and downs have laughed with me, supported me and enriched me.” – “the hundreds of highly talented employees who have helped make Carlson a globally competitive and respected company” – “And most painful of all.. my daughter.”

Her daughter, you see, is lesbian because she was born that way. She didn’t become that way through encounters with the wrong people or because she wasn’t raised correctly or as some kind of religious punishment. It IS who she IS.

Oh, how I wish this amendment were not on the ballot, but perhaps there will be a blessing in it. Perhaps Minnesota will rise up and once again show its understanding and basic fairness. Perhaps Minnesota and Minnesotans will rise up and vote NO.

Again, you can read Marilyn Carlson Nelson’s wonderful essay here.


MINNESOTA UNITED FOR FAMILIES is an organization set up to work against this constitutional amendment. It is well organized and endorsed by many, many important community organizations. I've donated to them and I hope you will too. You can also volunteer to help them in many different ways.

  
_________________________
Why not become a follower?
If you read my blog regularly, why not become a follower? All you have to do is click in the upper right hand corner and establish a simple means of communication. Then you'll be informed every time a new blog is posted here. If all that's confusing, here's Google's explanation of how to do it! If you don’t want to post comments on the blog, but would like to communicate with me about it, send me an email if you’d like.

Sunday, January 29, 2012

Bill and Newt


Oh, my! Newt Gingrich has run into big trouble in his campaign in Florida. Building a moon station for billions of dollars has NOT caught the imagination of the American people and Mitt Romney has jumped all over it.
by Charlie Leck

I love these lines from a story in the Washington Post, by David Maraniss (22 January 2012) about former President Bill Clinton and current presidential candidate, Newt Gingrich. Read them below and see what you think. I’d love to hear from you about how you immediately reacted (chasleck@gmail.com). Or, post a comment here on the blog.

“Gingrich and Clinton share a propensity to think they are the smartest person in the room. When they were in rooms together, in the mid-1990s, Clinton dominated. He knew Gingrich’s vocabulary, he understood how to outwonk him, and the result was that the president mesmerized and overwhelmed the otherwise-cocky House speaker.

“I’ve got a problem, I get in those meetings and as a person I like the President,” Gingrich acknowledged during the era, when I was reporting on the “Republican revolution” with my colleague Michael Weisskopf. “I melt when I’m around him. After I get out, I need two hours to detoxify. My people are nervous about me going in there because of the way I deal with this.”

I think Newt’s ship has sustained serious damage down in Florida and it is taking on water rapidly – bit of a sinking feeling it must be for him!

_________________________
Why not become a follower?
If you read my blog regularly, why not become a follower? All you have to do is click in the upper right hand corner and establish a simple means of communication. Then you'll be informed every time a new blog is posted here. If all that's confusing, here's Google's explanation of how to do it! If you don’t want to post comments on the blog, but would like to communicate with me about it, send me an email if you’d like.

Friday, January 27, 2012

Michele Bachmann will Run Again for Congress

Oh, boy! The lady from the 6th District says she’ll run again for Congress. What can I say?
by Charlie Leck

It doesn’t matter much, but only about 37 percent of Minnesotans look favorably upon Republican Congresswoman Michele Bachmann. That’s according to very recent poles. The only thing that matters, however, is how the people of her District feel (that’s District 6). My bet is that she has an approval rating up there of about 53 percent. I don’t like it, but it’s a fact of life and I need to live with it.

Who up there can knock her off? Terryl Clarke tried last time and couldn’t do it. She wants to make a run at Bachmann again, but I don’t favor it. Clarke ran a lack-luster campaign and she didn’t show much of a personality. She came off as dull and lifeless. I’ve scorned all her little emails seeking financial contributions to date and I plan to continue that. Let’s have a fresh face – and exciting one – to challenge the old war horse.

I don’t think Bachmann has done much for the people of the sixth over the last two years. Frankly, she has basically ignored them. Nevertheless, there is a certain mind-set in that District that doesn’t care. They want an evangelical Tea Party type and they’ll be very loud about it.

The only way the Democrats can win in that District is to put up a candidate with both charisma and credentials who will work hard to bring Bachmann down. Chances? Slim!

_________________________

Why not become a follower?
If you read my blog regularly, why not become a follower? All you have to do is click in the upper right hand corner and establish a simple means of communication. Then you'll be informed every time a new blog is posted here. If all that's confusing,
here's Google's explanation of how to do it! If you don’t want to post comments on the blog, but would like to communicate with me about it, send me an email if you’d like.

Thursday, January 26, 2012

The Remarkable Gabrielle Giffords


Watch Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords’ resignation from Congress and the tributes the Congress paid to her! Have a hanky nearby!
by Charlie Leck

I was pretty much left sobbing this morning as I watched a touching video on the Washington Post. Oh, my! Congresswoman Gabbie Giffords turned in her letter of resignation from the House of Representatives and it was an extremely beautiful and emotional event.

The video can be found on the Washington Post web site, or you can watch below as the Congresswoman enters the House chambers as a Representative for the last time and is then surrounded by friends as Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz (FL) reads Ms. Giffords’ letter of resignation in the House chambers yesterday. It was a touching, moving and highly emotional event.

Here’s a shortened version of the event on CNN if you don’t have time to listen to and watch the entire reading of the letter and the House’s extraordinary response (including shots of the choked up Speaker, John Boehner.


And, here’s the video…
(if you want to get quickly up to the reading of the letter, you can move ahead to about the 23 minute mark, though I recommend you watch her entrance and all the moving and beautiful comments about her).


There’s certainly not much more to be said. The nation wishes Gabbie, good, good luck. The state of Arizona must be very, very proud today!

_________________________
Why not become a follower?
If you read my blog regularly, why not become a follower? All you have to do is click in the upper right hand corner and establish a simple means of communication. Then you'll be informed every time a new blog is posted here. If all that's confusing, here's Google's explanation of how to do it! If you don’t want to post comments on the blog, but would like to communicate with me about it, send me an email if you’d like.

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Speak Softly and Carry a Big Stick


Obama looked more like a President last night than at any time since his inauguration speech!
by Charlie Leck

The man I voted for in 2008, who took office on a January day three years ago, finally stepped in out of the cold and dark, and spoke up last night as he did in the 2008 campaign. And he did it not a moment too soon; for his loyal followers, of which I am one, were about to abandon him. We needed the Barrack Obama who got elected by the great American middle class to speak up for those who put him in office.

Now, we who voted him into office must be prepared to hold his feet to the coals. He must not back-slide or recant. He must stay firm and committed to the things he said in his State of the Union address last evening. He must!

In a New York Times editorial this morning there was qualified praise for the speech

“…the country’s problems are profound. There are 13.1 million unemployed, and the risk of stagnation is real. Republican candidates are pounding on the wrong, but seductive, notion that the real problem is government spending – especially on the ‘others’ the poor and minorities. Congressional Republicans have barely wavered in their obstructionism.
“Mr. Obama has become steadily more assertive, but he will have to push even harder. The State of the Union address was a chance to do that, and he did not squander it.

As the President said last night…

“We can either settle for a country where a shrinking number of people do really well, while a growing number of Americans barely get by, or we can restore an economy where everyone gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the same set of rules.”

Obama was tough last night. The question is obvious: Can he be tough under fire when negotiating with the Speaker, who, for the moment anyway, controls a majority of the votes in the House?

We will know soon enough – even long before the launch of the campaign following the Democratic National Convention. If President Obama stands firm, speaking softly, but carrying a big stick*, he’ll get reelected and return the House of Representatives to Democratic Party control. Then we'll get people back to work as we rebuild both our economy and our country.

Speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far.
*It was in 1901, at the Minnesota State Fair, that Vice President Theodore Roosevelt first used the expression: “Speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far.” The date was September 2nd and twelve days later President William McKinley would be assassinated, opening the door to the presidency to Roosevelt.

_________________________

Why not become a follower?
If you read my blog regularly, why not become a follower? All you have to do is click in the upper right hand corner and establish a simple means of communication. Then you'll be informed every time a new blog is posted here. If all that's confusing, here's Google's explanation of how to do it! If you don’t want to post comments on the blog, but would like to communicate with me about it, send me an email if you’d like.

Old Ideas


Leonard Cohen’s new album is incredible, combining remarkable tunes and melodies with mysterious and dramatic lyrics that make you think – and sometimes bend your mind.
by Charlie Leck

I ordered Old Ideas yesterday. I listened to all 41 minutes of it, compliments of National Public Radio and it was just really good – just fine listening – and as captivating as can be. What wondrous sounds and what impactful lyrics. I’ll spend many pleasant hours listening to this fine, fine work.

Cohen has a huge following. It’s not surprising. He especially appeals to people of the 60s. He comes out of a Jewish heritage and combines that with some Zen-like meditation.

Here’s just a tiny example of the mellow, soft and quiet music’s mysterious lyrics…

Goin’ home without my sorrow
Goin’ home sometime tomorrow
Goin’ home to where it’s better than before
Goin’ home without my burden
Goin’ home behind the curtain
Goin’ home without this costume that I wore

Another tune carries these extraordinary lyrics. Cohen’s voice is filled (loaded) with passion and drama.

The troubles came.
I saved what I could save.
The threat of life a particle away.
But there were chains so I hastened to the hay.
There were chains so I loved you like a slave.

Show me the place where you want your slave to go!
Show me the place… I’ve forgotten… I don’t know.
Show me the place while my head is bendin’ low
Show me the place where you want your slave to go.
Show me the place, help me roll the stone away.
Show me the place, I can’t move this thing alone.
Show me the place where the word became a man.
Show me the place where the suffering began.

The lyrics are fine, indeed; but they are powerful when combined with the dramatic music and the raspy Cohen voice.

Here’s the way NPR explains Cohen in a little story it posted to introduce the free listen to the album…

In the end, of course, Leonard Cohen remains his own man, with a unique sound that brings the temple to the cabaret and a sensibility balancing humor and profundity on the crystal stem of a glass filled with red wine of an ideal vintage.

This free listen, from NPR, won’t be up too much longer, so go there and let this remarkable album captivate you.

In the song Lullaby, Cohen gives us these twisted, mysterious lyrics…

Here’s my lullaby… Here’s my lullaby
Well, the mouse ate the crumbs
And the cat ate the crust…
Now they’ve fallen in love
And they’re talkin’ in tongues
…Sleep baby, sleep…
There’s a mornin’ to go
The wind in the trees
They’re talkin in tongues…
If you heart is torn
I won’t wonder why
If the night is long
Here’s my lullaby
Here’s my lullaby

Cohen is an extraordinary poet and he also happens to be a superior musical talent. The combination is tantalizing.

_________________________
Why not become a follower?
If you read my blog regularly, why not become a follower? All you have to do is click in the upper right hand corner and establish a simple means of communication. Then you'll be informed every time a new blog is posted here. If all that's confusing, here's Google's explanation of how to do it! If you don’t want to post comments on the blog, but would like to communicate with me about it, send me an email if you’d like.

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Osawatomie


The President’s early December speech in Osawatomie, Kansas is an indicator of both tonight’s State of the Union presentation and his coming Campaign!
by Charlie Leck

It’s okay, I think, to try to guess where the President is going to go with his State of the Union address tonight. It’s part of the game, you know – just like trying to forecast the results of the Super Bowl in two weeks.

First off, recognize the fact that the 2012 race to the White House has begun. It’s too bad! We’d rather it hadn’t, but it has and it is going to be boring for the first few months. Now, here in mid-January, comes a chance for the President to respond to some of those awful things Republicans have been saying about him as they campaign in primaries from Iowa to New England to Florida.

So, what will the President say?
Just go back and read the President’s early December speech in Osawatomie, Kansas. That’s the speech in which he praised Teddy Roosevelt, the 26th President of the United States, who served two terms from 1901-1909. In the speech, Obama tried to take on much of the character and charisma of Teddy. There’s good reason; for Teddy Roosevelt was a tough character and a popular president – and he was the leader of the Rough Riders into Cuba during the Spanish-American War. He received posthumously the Medal of Honor in 2001. Roosevelt had grown up in a privileged family, attended Harvard and Columbia Law School and was adept in 5 languages. Nevertheless, Tough Teddy was closely identified as common and middle class.

Obama reminded his listeners that his grandparents had lived in Kansas. His grandmother was born in Wichita. His grandpa served in Patton’s army in World War II. His grandma worked on a bomber assembly line.

“Together, they shared the optimism of a nation that triumped over a Depression and fascism. They believed in an America where hard work paid off, responsibility was rewarded, and anyone could make it if they tried – no matter who you were, where you came from, or how your started out.”

The Osawatomie speech was about and directed to the middle class. And don’t you forget it. [If you want to read the entire speech, it is here thanks to the Washington Post.]

Obama is going to take on a tough-guy character and he is going to begin speaking very directly and strongly about America’s forgotten and abused middle class. He’s going to begin challenging Republicans instead of trying to inveigle them.

He’s going to ask clearly: “What has happened to the Middle Class?” He’s going to talk about the wide gap between the wealthy and the rest. He’s going to plead for generosity and compassion and he going to attack selfishness and greed.

He’s going to talk about the former America and compare it to the current America.

He’s going to paint a picture about where this America is headed.

He’s going to line up on the side of the massive percentage of the population that is not wealthy. He’s going to ask them what the Republican Party has done for them.

As the president said in Osawatomie…

But this isn’t just another political debate. This is the defining issue of our time. This is a make or break moment for the middle class, and all those who are fighting to get into the middle class. At stake is whether this will be a country where working people can earn enough to raise a family, build a modest savings, own a home, and secure their retirement.

“Now, in the midst of this debate, there are some who seem to be suffering from a kind of collective amnesia. After all that’s happened, after the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, they want to return to the same practices that got us into this mess. In fact, they want to go back to the same policies that have stacked the deck against middle-class Americans for too many years. Their philosophy is simple: we are better off when everyone is left to fend for themselves and play by their own rules.”

You’ll hear much more of the same tonight. “We have got to make the middle class important in America again. This is the defining issue of our time!”

_________________________

Why not become a follower?
If you read my blog regularly, why not become a follower? All you have to do is click in the upper right hand corner and establish a simple means of communication. Then you'll be informed every time a new blog is posted here. If all that's confusing, here's Google's explanation of how to do it! If you don’t want to post comments on the blog, but would like to communicate with me about it, send me an email if you’d like.

Sunday, January 22, 2012

Flailing Away at Death

I read something on an infrequent blog* yesterday and it stirred me somewhat and put me to thinking.
Charlie Leck

Plumb Bob wrote on his blog:

Death, you always call too soon, we are not ready, we have plans unfulfilled, the leaves of my life like a limb are stilling growing, the blossoms of my garden have not faded, the wild bees still fly here.
My fruit is not all fully yielded, but you come early, wait, another day, another hour, but your call is clear: “Come away with me my love, the world has had you too long, I want you with me.”

I like it, somehow! It is an easy read and it is intriguing. I left a comment for Plumb Bob:

As for me, I shall not be ready! Like a school assignment I cannot seem to find the time to do. I cannot prepare! I cannot find time for thee, o death… so you need to steal me away and I will go kicking, biting and fighting to the end.

I also reminded Plumb Bob of e.e. cummings' fine poem: “oh death, I wouldn’t like death if death were good.”

Dying is fine) but Death

?o
baby
i

wouldn’t like

Death if Death
were
good: for

when (instead of stopping to think) you

begin to feel of it, dying
’s miraculous
why? be

cause dying is

perfectly natural; perfectly
putting
it mildly lively (but)

Death

is strictly
scientific
& artificial &

evil & legal)

we thank thee
god
almighty for dying
(forgive us, o life!the sin of Death


I think the poet’s comparison of dying, which we’re all doing now, to death is remarkable. If you missed that, go back and read it again.

Plumb Bob doesn’t post very often (every month or two, I suppose), but if you want to look in on his blog click here.


*A blog to which posts are made quite infrequently and irregularly.
_________________________
Why not become a follower?
If you read my blog regularly, why not become a follower? All you have to do is click in the upper right hand corner and establish a simple means of communication. Then you'll be informed every time a new blog is posted here. If all that's confusing, here's Google's explanation of how to do it! If you don’t want to post comments on the blog, but would like to communicate with me about it, send me an email if you’d like.

She Stands Up for Minnesota


Her family has a long history and tradition of philanthropy and they’ve shown enormous affection for the land and its water.
by Charlie Leck

She’s a retiring type who does not like to be in the lime-light. A publication of some influence (Politics in Minnesota) just called her the most influential Democrat in Minnesota. At first blush one might conclude that it’s because of her money. Far from it, however, because she’s also very bright and very committed to the things she believes in.

I’ll concur with the magazine’s choice. She probably is the most influential Democrat in our state. Democrats, if they got to know her, would really like this woman.

I don’t want this to be biographical, but you really ought to know a little bit about the woman, Alida Rockerfeller Messinger. She’s 63 years old. Her father was John D. Rockefeller III. Blanchette Hooker Rockefeller was her mouth. Senator John D. Rockefeller IV, U.S. Senator from West Virginia, is her brother.

In Minnesota, she has homes in Minneapolis and Afton.

Mrs. Messinger is an important philanthropist in this state and her major concern seems to be for the environment. In addition to gifting large amounts of money through her own charitable trust, she is also a trustee of the Rockefeller Family Fund.

She was formerly married to Minnesota’s current governor, Mark Dayton, and had two sons with him. They divorced in 1986 but they retain an enormous amount of respect for each other and she was significantly involved in Dayton’s election campaign in 2010.

Our local newspaper, the StarTribune has called her “a quiet but enormously powerful force in Minnesota politics.” [Click here to read the story!] The story by Baird Helgeson says that Mrs. Messinger “has quietly given at least $10 million to candidates and causes over the past decade.” She gave a half-million to a group that supported her ex-husband in his race for governor.

The story also indicates she’ll be generous in her support for President Obama’s reelection campaign this year.

I don’t know Mrs. Messinger, but I have a lot of reasons to like her. She was very generous to one organization I had a lot of affection for over the years and for which I volunteered two years of full time labor [1000 Friends of Minnesota]. Because of her interest in land preservation and open spaces, she virtually carried that organization for a number of years.

I was at a small campaign rally for Governor Dayton a couple of years ago, and Mrs. Messinger was there, quietly working the crowd and showing her complete support for her ex-husband.

Mrs. Messinger is a strong supporter of an organization called Win Minnesota whose clear and admitted goal is to return the state legislature back to Democratic control. She agrees with her ex-husband-governor that the wealthy pay too little in taxes to the state and that the Republicans do not defend our state’s environment and open spaces nearly enough.

Since the beginning of 2001, Mrs. Messinger has given more than 9 million dollars to political causes (campaign financing). You can see her totals and those of Minnesota’s other top financial contributors here.

Some have accused this quiet, shy and gracious woman of trying to buy Minnesota politics “with daddy’s money.” [Mitch Berg in his blog, Shot in the Dark, 16 July 2010] No, what she’s trying to do is save Minnesota from those who don’t understand how perilous it is to abuse a state’s treasury of environmental beauty. Mrs. Messinger cares deeply and passionately about this state and she wants to protect its wetlands, lakes and open spaces.
_________________________

Why not become a follower?
If you read my blog regularly, why not become a follower? All you have to do is click in the upper right hand corner and establish a simple means of communication. Then you'll be informed every time a new blog is posted here. If all that's confusing, here's Google's explanation of how to do it! If you don’t want to post comments on the blog, but would like to communicate with me about it, send me an email if you’d like.

Saturday, January 21, 2012

Foolishness in South Carolina


I’m trying to watch the South Carolina primary campaign with some sense of intelligence. If you don’t think that’s difficult, you’re not paying attention!
by Charlie Leck

I’ve never seen anything like it! Never! The most serious candidate in the race down there in South Carolina is Stephen Colbert (or is he Herman Cain?). The rest are all jokes – and really bad jokes at that.

Perry pulls out and promptly endorses Gingrich. Within hours the news breaks that Gingrich proposes to his second wife that they have an open marriage and he be allowed to carry on a sexual relationship with a woman he was seeing (who is now his third wife). The funny part of the story is that Gingrich had the nerve in a candidates’ debate to turn a question about that proposal to his second wife back on the questioner, calling it disgusting. Whoa! Wait! What? The audience hooted and hollered its approval of Gingrich and gave him a standing ovation. Whoa! Wait! What?

In the middle of the South Carolina debate, the state of Iowa over-turned its announced results that Mitt Romney had won the caucuses there. The state announced, even though it could not account for a very large percentage of the ballots, that Ricky Santorum had won. Santorum had the nerve to make a big deal out of it. What happened to all the ballots? That’s what the reporters asked the Republican Party back in Iowa. They had no idea and explained, you know, that the whole process was a volunteer effort and no one is really accountable for any of it. Whoa! Wait! What?

The Super PACs are at work in South Carolina spending huge amounts of money from unidentified donors saying terrible things about the candidates they don’t support.

Stephan Colbert and John Stewart founded a Super PAC and were then surprised to discover they could say anything they wanted about anyone. So, they promptly called Mitt Romney a “serial killer” because, as Chairman of Bain Capital he had knocked of a couple of corporations and, of course, the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that corporations are people too. Whoa! Wait! What?

Have you ever noticed, while watching these debates, that Ron Paul is always way over on the far right. Whoa! Wait! What? No, really! And, have you noticed that he is the only one of the candidates that really directly answers the questions asked. Most times people don’t like his answers, but, in fact, he does answer the questions. He doesn’t realize that this is not smart politics.

Are you getting the idea here? Thank goodness the vote is coming up soon. I just can’t take any more of this!

_________________________

Why not become a follower?
If you read my blog regularly, why not become a follower? All you have to do is click in the upper right hand corner and establish a simple means of communication. Then you'll be informed every time a new blog is posted here. If all that's confusing, here's Google's explanation of how to do it! If you don’t want to post comments on the blog, but would like to communicate with me about it, send me an email if you’d like.

Will Rogers: Before My Time


Will Rogers would certainly have had an abundance of material for his comedy acts and his newspaper columns had he been around in our time.
by Charlie Leck

I’m reading a biography of Will Rogers. It was written by Richard D. White, Jr., a professor of Public Administration at Louisiana State University. It’s a good book. I’m certainly enjoying it.

I was surprised to learn that Will Rogers died (1935) five years before I was born. As a boy, I can remember watching film clips of him doing his little lasso act and knocking out his one-liners as if they were powerful line-drives to the outfield gaps. What I had watched with my parents must have been film clips of him. As a little tyke I was probably not prepared to understand how a dead man could be there on the screen entertaining me with rope tricks.

Rogers loved to stick pins in the soft skin of politicians. White makes that very clear in this book. Oh, what material Rogers would have in this day and age! Ey?

In one of his newspaper columns he wrote…

“You know the more you read and observe about this Politic thing You got [sic] to admit that each Party is worse than the other. The one that’s out always looks the best… I tell you Folks, all Politics is Apple Sauce.”

In 1924, in the New York Times, he wrote…

“Every time a bill comes up they have a million things to decide that have nothing to do with the merit of the bill. They first must consider is, or was, it introduced by a member of the opposite Political Party. It if is [sic], why then something is wrong with it from the start… Then the principal thing of course, ‘what will it do for me back home?’ ...Politics and self-preservation must come first, never mind the majority of the people… A man’s thoughts are naturally on his next term, more than on his country.”

In our current time, Will Rogers’ mind would be blown out by sensory overload!

_________________________

Why not become a follower?
If you read my blog regularly, why not become a follower? All you have to do is click in the upper right hand corner and establish a simple means of communication. Then you'll be informed every time a new blog is posted here. If all that's confusing, here's Google's explanation of how to do it! If you don’t want to post comments on the blog, but would like to communicate with me about it, send me an email if you’d like.

Friday, January 20, 2012

Be Safe On-Line


Here’s some terribly good advice and instruction for you about staying safe when you’re working on-line. It comes from Google!
by Charlie Leck

I’m one of the old timers, hanging around, who really does love the Web (the Internet). It both educates me and entertains me. As well, it allows me to express myself. And, if you count email as part of the Web, which I think you must, it allows me very rapid communications with my family and friends at, in essence, no cost.

So, as a friend of mine likes to put it, “what’s not to like?”

My wife’s first answer is: “Intruders!” Her second and third is: “Web nuts! Crooked bastards!”

I guess she’s correct. We’ve had our share of malware attacks and invaders who sought to penetrate into our important and personal data. Damn!

So, I was pleased to find good advice from Google. Obviously, this is a company whose astronomically wealthy business depends on people who are not afraid of the Web. So I was pleased to find a Google site on-line that carefully explained what procedures we should take to stay safe. It’s called Stay Safe On-Line. Go and visit it if you worry, as seriously as my wife does, about protecting yourself from predatory geeks.

The Google site deals with terms that most of us don’t even begin to understand – like phishing, malware, and security on our mobile devices (cell phones). It also deals with safety in using cloud services (another concept most of us old-timers don’t get).

The Google site is also designed for the lay person and those of us who aren’t techie. There are good explanations of the common jargon and there are resources you can find to help you get out of trouble when you’re in it.

If you, like I, get frightened sometimes when you travel out there on the World Wide Web, this is a good page for you to know about. Bookmark it someplace where you can bring it up if you’re in need. First, however, go examine it and learn what you can in advance.

Feel safe when you go on-line! Here’s a Google video about on-line safety.


_________________________

Why not become a follower?
If you read my blog regularly, why not become a follower? All you have to do is click in the upper right hand corner and establish a simple means of communication. Then you'll be informed every time a new blog is posted here. If all that's confusing, here's Google's explanation of how to do it! If you don’t want to post comments on the blog, but would like to communicate with me about it, send me an email if you’d like.

Stock Market Lookin’ Good

The U.S. stock trading markets looked good this week and these are positive signs for the economy, but it’s Friday and there will be profit-taking today.
by Charlie Leck

My, oh my! The last thing in the world I am is a financial expert. To me, the stock market in the U.S. is like a game of darts (from a very long distance). Yet, I watch it closely as if I knew what was (is) going on.

It’s been a big week for the market and it has shown a lot of gains. I’ve noticed in the past that, when this happens, investors want to bank some of their profits and it usually happens on a Friday afternoon. They’ll watch the market this morning and, if there is an inkling of downward movement, they’ll quickly sell and bank their profits from the big week.

Don’t worry! Be happy! I think the economy is turning around in America. President Obama, anyway, is certainly hoping it is.

_________________________
Why not become a follower?
If you read my blog regularly, why not become a follower? All you have to do is click in the upper right hand corner and establish a simple means of communication. Then you'll be informed every time a new blog is posted here. If all that's confusing, here's Google's explanation of how to do it! If you don’t want to post comments on the blog, but would like to communicate with me about it, send me an email if you’d like.

Thursday, January 19, 2012

Below Zero!

What a strange winter we’ve had in Minnesota! It is January 18 and, until last night, we’ve not had any below zero temperatures this winter.
by Charlie Leck

Last night the temperatures dipped down to 12 below zero! We’ve had an amazingly mild winter.

Ten days ago it got up to 55 degrees here on one afternoon and guys were out hitting golf balls. There hasn’t been even an inch of snow this winter. It was strange feeling the temperature drop last night after such a mild start to the winter. Below zero! It’s certainly been a long time coming.

Does it mean we’ll have a short winter this year? Or will winter come and hang around all through April (as it has done a time or two in the 50 years I’ve lived here)? Or will spring come in mid-March and give us a wonderful warm season this year? Ah, the mysteries of Minnesota weather! We all love weather madness up here. You betcha!

Drought
One thing certain is that we need some moisture. It was a terribly dry late summer and autumn. We are officially in drought conditions.

Fascination with the weather
There is no state in the union whose residents are more fascinated with weather. In most major cities the TV weather report is about a minute or two in length. Here it might go on for 8 or 9 minutes. Most of the local stations spend the bulk of their on-air talent budget on the weatherman (or woman, as the case may be).

Years ago a local writer, Steve Thayer, wrote a magnificent murder mystery called The Weatherman.* It was a really well written novel and it had national success (and phenomenal Minnesota sales). I remember that one part of the story described the average Minnesotan’s absolute fascination with the evening weather report. Reviews on the book were mixed, but I thought it was a good story very well written. I have a copy of that book in my library and I’d certainly be willing to share it with eager readers.

I guess it’s understandable that the most used app on my iPhone is the weather app. Next comes the stocks app (the market got up to 12,579 yesterday – up 96.88 for the day). I think we’re talking economic recovery here.

About two weeks ago, the northern half of Florida was experiencing very damaging below freezing temperatures. On the same day the temperatures here in the Minneapolis area reached 47 degrees.

Below Zero would be a wonderful title for a short story. Let me think about that.

*Thayer, Steve: The Weatherman [1995, Signet, New York]
  
_________________________

Why not become a follower?
If you read my blog regularly, why not become a follower? All you have to do is click in the upper right hand corner and establish a simple means of communication. Then you'll be informed every time a new blog is posted here. If all that's confusing, here's Google's explanation of how to do it! If you don’t want to post comments on the blog, but would like to communicate with me about it, send me an email if you’d like.